![]() ![]() What are the requirements that need to be met? Particularly in an important context such as this, I think you'd want said requirements to be carefully researched, robustly documented, and well reviewed (by multiple, independent, qualified, parties representing the different legitimate interests). The first could be approached with an eye towards supporting the various applications, but it need not and arguably should not be ignored simply because there is not yet official agreement within one or some of those application communities.īefore you can certify something you need to establish what you will certify it to. The latter is a specific application of the first, and there are others. ![]() ![]() However, that can be broken down: 1) MITMing, 2) AV scanning in a MITMing context. Comment: Take note that Emsisoft would have to be set at its default real-time protection mode of "balanced" to achieve the overall 87% score noted above.Ĭlick to expand.I get what you are saying. That's better than almost all the competition, though Norton and McAfee both managed 91 percent in this test. ESET earned an 84 percent blocking rate, evenly divided between blocking URL access and wiping out downloads. I continue until I've recorded the results for at least 100 URLs. ![]() In this test, I launch nasty URLs one after another and note whether the antivirus blocks access to the URL completely, wipes out the malicious payload, or sits idly doing nothing. Before Avira's blitz, the top score was 91 percent, shared by McAfee AntiVirus Plus (2016) and Symantec Norton Security Premium. That total score of 87 percent is pretty good, but Avira recently scored 99 percent protection. Out of 100 verified malware-hosting URLs, Emsisoft blocked 67 percent at the URL level and wiped out another 20 percent during download. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |